Free Articles For Reprint

Science Articles

Science Articles Writer

 Articles by this Author

Dinosaurs

 


 

We're all familiar with dinosaurs from movies such as Jurassic Park and King Kong, but how much do you really know about dinosaurs? Here are 10 facts about dinosaurs which you can amaze your friends and family with:

1. Dinosaurs first appeared during the Triassic period (248 to 213 million years ago), and were the dominant land animals through the entire Jurassic period, and to the end of the Cretaceous period (65 million years ago).

2. We know about dinosaurs because fossils have been found. The fossils, which are generally found in sedimentary rocks, including fossilized body parts (bones, teeth, skin, claws, etc.), as well as trace fossils ("ichnofossils") which show how the animals lived, which include footprints, burrows, nests, toothmarks, dung, etc.

3. The earth's continents slowly move through a process known as "plate tectonics". When dinosaurs first appeared during the Triassic period, all the earth's continents were joined together in one super-continent known as "Pangea".

4. All the familiar types of dinosaurs, died off at the end of the Cretaceous period. There are many different theories why this may have happened, but today the most popular theory is that an asteriod hit the earth, blocking out the sunlight so that there was not enough food available. Evidence for this theory is a layer of iridium, which is believed to have come from the asteroid, has been found around the world, and a possible impact site found in southern Mexico.

5. The smallest known dinosaur is Compsognathus, which lived in Europe during the late Jurassic, and was about the size of a chicken. Compsognathus is believed to have eaten insects, lizards and other small animals.

6. There are quite a few candidates for the largest dinosaur, as there are several types of dinosaur that were over 100 feet (30 metres) long. The largest was certainly some kind of sauropod (a four-legged plant-eating dinosaur with a long neck) that lived during the late Jurassic or early Cretaceous period.

7. The word "dinosaur" was coined by Sir Richard Owen, who also founded the Natural History Museum in London, England. "Dinosaur" means terrible lizard, and is based on the Greek words "deinos" (terrible) and "sauros" (lizard).

8. People have been finding dinosaur fossils for hundreds of years, but didn't know what they were until quite recently. The first time that a dinosaur was scientifically described was in 1824, by William Buckland.

9. At the same time that dinosaurs dominated the land, there were many aquatic reptiles that dominated the seas, although these were not dinosaurs. These aquatic reptiles included plesiosaurs, nothosaurs, mosasaurs and ichythosaurs.

10. Although birds seem to have evolved from dinosaurs, no non-avian flying dinosaurs are known. However, at the time of dinosaurs there were many flying reptiles, known as pterosaurs.

About the Author

For more information about dinosaurs, please go to http://www.dinosaurjungle.com/

For latest dinosaur news please go to http://www.dinosaursnews.com/

This article is Copyright (C) 2007, Answers 2000 Limited. Permission is granted to reprint provided no changes are made,

Stem Cell Research

Embryonic Stem Cell Research and Harvesting - A Unique Declaration   by Robin Calamaio


Preface. This is an excerpt from the Ebook, "Abortion: How (and Why) Abortion Resides in the Weakest Form of Human Thought and Valuation" (pages 41-45). This comes rather late in the discussion, so some statements here refer back to previous points in the Ebook. I will insert a few comments in [brackets] to clarify a previously made point. The full work is free at Website in Author Bio.

Embryonic Stem Cell Endeavors

There are several ways to approach this subject. But since I have been approaching abortion from the three world views, it seems reasonable to continue on this path. Let's first examine the Naturalistic view, then the Biblical Theological view, and then the Humanistic view. But first, what are "Embryonic Stem Cell Endeavors"?

Stem cells are extracted from human embryos in the hope that those cells may one day be used to cure various maladies in other human beings. As of this writing, the cells are being used for research and experimentation in the hope of finding those cures. There is only a five day window in the development of the embryo when this harvest can occur. Presently, embryonic stem cells taken for this research require the death of the embryo. If embryonic stem cell research one day results in cures for other humans, then a full scale cultivating and harvesting of embryos will ensue.

The Naturalistic View.

[In pages 8-28, I established that Naturalists/Evolutionists are adamantly pro-life. The following assertions flow from that demonstrated conclusion.] For starters, it is irrelevant to the Naturalist if these stem cell endeavors are a natural or unnatural enterprise. As we have seen, the Naturalist is for the life of any embryo over any present, malady-ridden human. Any one of them might possess the needed genius to save our species - and world - from our impending planetary doom. Currently, stem cell research is just research and a relatively few embryos have been killed. But even this loss is totally unacceptable to the Naturalist, as our next Einstein may already be strewn in some lab - forever lost. But if this research leads to cures for other humans, embryos will be grown for harvest. Its stem cells, indeed its life, will be extracted for consumption by another human.

Now let me ask you a question. When a species consumes those of its own species, what is this called? I was going to give you a moment to think of the answer, but you already know it. And, you are right! This is known as cannibalism. Therapies coming from embryonic stem cell harvesting will be a sophisticated form of cannibalism.

I hear the screeching even now. "What kind of radical lunacy is that? Cannibalism? What an outrageous claim by a dangerous, right-wing, religious oppressor! Cannibalism is the eating of the flesh of ones own species! Nobody is eating an embryo! They will enter sick bodies by injection, or implant, or pills or some way other than eating. And besides that, eating is for nutrition - and the embryos will be consumed for medicinal purposes!" Well, are you done yet? " *#%@* no, you cruel, hard-hearted, twisted, *#+%*, hypocrite! These embryos will be used to heal people from all kinds of horrific diseases. Do you want to let these people suffer and die? What kind of 'Christian' are you? And what if it is your Mom or your Dad that can be cured? What if it is your child? What if it is you? You will change your tone real quick. And what if ...." I know you are still screeching, but I am temporarily cutting you off and will now address those not ruled by emotion. But, for now, let's leave out anything that has to do with "religion" or "Christianity." I'll get to the "God part" later.

When I stated this harvesting would be "a sophisticated form of cannibalism," I am simply speaking of the biological reality. Embryonic stem cell therapies will be the consumption of one genetically complete (and unique) human life form - by another genetically complete (and unique) human life form. Any biologist, researcher, or doctor who denies this physical reality has left the realm of science - and opted for some kind of metaphysical speculation. And, to state what is now obvious to you, an embryo is human flesh. It is nothing else and it cannot become anything else. It's just very young and very small - and unable to defend itself.

Robin Calamaio - Christian in 1977. B.A., Bus. Admin ('90), Master of Divinity (Emmanuel School of Religion '92). Major writings: "No Tithe for the Christian" "Love and the Bible" "Death and the Bible" "Abortion: How (and Why)..." "Capital Punishment and the Bible"

All free at www.freelygive-n.com .

RNA Therapy

RNA Therapy

Better Than Stem Cells? Short Interfering RNA Hold Promise For Dramatic New Treatments    by John Leavitt, Ph.D.

 

I rarely give stock advice. The last time I did was in the summer of 1964 when I read in the newspaper that a new company called ComSat was having an IPO in September. I considered this, perhaps naively, a sure thing. Yet being in my first job I had no money to invest. So, I decided to watch this stock with the fantasy of having invested $1,000 ($6,548 in today's dollars). My plan was to buy at the IPO price of $10 a share and then sell just before the launch of the first commercial communications satellite, just in case the launch failed. The stock rose meteorically from $10 per share to $80 (the launch did not fail), then the stock split and rose again to more than $80 per share. I made about $240,000 from my $1,000 fantasy investment, equivalent to $1.5 million today.

The reason I bring this up is that recently, I was fortunate to attend a small meeting in Boston that focused on developments in the seemingly esoteric field of siRNA or "short interfering RNA" used to silence genes. The promise of this technology has rightfully created a significant buzz in the scientific and investment communities over for the last two to three years. And as I left this meeting, it occurred to me that in the next 10 to 20 years, siRNA, also called "RNAi", will probably dominate drug development, with many successful drugs currently targeting specific proteins, like Genentech's Herceptin and Imclone's Erbitux, being replaced by RNAi-based drugs. Furthermore, many disease-causing proteins thought to be "undrugable", like the metastatic biomarker L-plastin for colon, breast, melanoma, prostate, and bladder cancer, could now be targeted by RNAi drugs.

Businesses Are Being Built Around siRNA

Andrew Fire, of Stanford, and Craig Mello, at the University of Massachusetts, discovered "gene silencing by double-stranded RNA" in 1998, earning them the 2006 Nobel Prize in Medicine. In 2001 companies started forming around RNAi. One of them, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals filed its S-1 registration with the SEC in February 2004, claiming $23,000 in cash assets and creating 3.2 million shares worth 28 cents each. Two years later, Alnylam went public with stock selling at $7.50 per share after an unprecedented short start-up time. Alnylam's shares were selling on NASDAQ at around $16 per share in early July after hitting a 52-week high of $24.46 last December. By December or perhaps early winter, Alnylam will announce the outcome of its Phase II clinical trial on their lead product for treating the infant respiratory disease caused by Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV infections). Alnylam has multiple collaborations funded by Merck, and about 20 pipeline products. At the same time Merck bought Sirna Therapeutics, another RNAi company with strong IP for this technology. During the last year, in order to acquire additional RNAi-relevant IP, Hoffmann-La Roche bought 454, Sigma Chemicals bought Proligo, Alnylam bought Ribopharma, Acuity Pharmaceuticals merged with two other companies to form Opko, Dharmacon became part of Thermo-Fisher Scientific, and RXi Pharmaceuticals was spawned by CytRx. Also Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Abbott Labs have started R&D programs around RNAi.

Santaris Pharma, a Danish company formed in 2003, has a novel method for making and stabilizing RNAi and drug products in Phase II clinical development. Santaris is strategically partnered through licensing agreements with Enzon, a leading clinical research organization that is conducting clinical trials in the U.S. for many Santaris' drug candidates. Santaris has completed Phase I/II clinical trials in Denmark, France, the U.K. and the U.S. for an RNAi drug for treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and Phase I trials for a second product treating renal and colon carcinoma and multiple myeloma. The CLL product should compete favorably with Genta's BCL-2 antisense (RNA) product in development for over a decade, through phase III clinical development, and in pre-registration for CLL and malignant melanoma.

As an aside, it's worth noting that several of these companies are Nerac clients.

How RNAi works

RNAi therapy is not like stem cell therapy, which will take decades to develop. Approval of the first RNAi drugs is expected in three to five years. This is because stem cell therapy is complex and the science is still in its infancy. By contrast RNAi is well developed because of the advanced understanding of genetics and gene expression. In fact RNAi will be used to make stem cell therapy work.

The 1993 discovery of microRNA, a natural mechanism of gene regulation in all cells, accelerated understanding of how RNAi works. SiRNA is an exogenous synthetic version of the natural endogenous microRNA that takes advantage of the cellular machinery that normally processes and mediates the function of microRNA. Micro- or siRNA (RNAi) is targeted to inhibit a specific counterpart transcript (messenger RNA) that serves as a template for synthesis of an individual protein, the natural process of gene expression. RNAi is processed by a ribonuclease enzyme that binds to a larger precursor siRNA. The enzyme processes siRNA into a 21-nucleotide base-pair double stranded molecule. The specificity of RNAi is governed both by its 'complimentarity' to a particular messenger RNA nucleic acid sequence and also by a complex of proteins whose function is to mediate the binding of the RNAi to a target sequence on the messenger RNA, usually in the 3'-noncoding region of the messenger RNA. This binding event leads to a shut-down in synthesis of the protein encoded by the messenger RNA (called "knock-down").

There is currently little mystery about how to design siRNA molecules and synthesize them, as this method is aided by readily available algorithms. In fact, Todd Woolf, CEO & President of RXi Pharmaceuticals, says, "Weeks instead of years to lead compounds." This finely tunable technique of RNAi knock-down is also currently used in many academic research labs.

Finally, many studies have been completed including Phase I clinical trials that indicate the siRNA is essentially non-toxic. Conventional drugs have always required the balancing of efficacious doses with consideration of the drug's negative side-effects.

RNAi's Dramatic Performance in Preclinical Studies

Several companies and labs have shown siRNA conjugated with cholesterol or other lipid carriers will attach to cholesterol carrier proteins in the blood and transport to the liver rather than being excreted. If an siRNA is used that knocks down an enzyme involved in cholesterol production by the liver, then serum cholesterol levels can be diminished in mice by 30 to 40 percent without diminishing the good cholesterol (HDL) levels. The blockbuster statin drugs like Lipitor, which are well known to produce toxic side-effects in the liver, also reduce cholesterol levels in the blood by about 30 to 40 percent. In the mouse model, the cholesterol-reducing effects of one treatment with siRNA lasts three to four weeks.

In a mouse model for intestinal adenomatous polyposis, the mice develop a high density of benign polyps that ultimately block the intestines, subsequently leading to death. In humans, such polyps are precursors to malignant colon cancer. Johannes Fruehauf of Cequent Pharmaceuticals and Harvard Medical School described a novel method for delivering siRNA to the intestinal tract which targeted beta-catenin synthesized by polyp cells. Increased expression of beta-catenin is associated with proliferation of polyp cells but not by itself in the conversion of benign polyps to malignancy. Cequent has demonstrated that bacteria, such as E. coli, carrying about 100 copies of recombinant siRNA in a plasmid vector, can simply be fed to polyposis mice whose intestines are clogged with polyps. Administration of these bacteria containing the siRNA copies killed the polyps and cleared up the problem completely; the histopathology pictures established clearly that the intestines were cleansed of the polyps. The explanation for this efficacy is that thousands of these bacteria were engulfed by the polyp cells by the natural process of endocytosis. The bacteria were dissolved in the endosomes, the plasmids carrying the siRNA insert were fragmented, and the liberated siRNA inhibited beta-catenin synthesis in the polyps. This last step causes the polyps to self-destruct by the natural mechanism of apoptosis, or programmed cell death.

The prospect for siRNA as a therapy seems unlimited in that any and every gene can become a target for this therapy. Before siRNA, many potential disease targets were considered "undrugable," meaning that virtually every disease can be considered for siRNA therapy, including all forms of cancer, metabolic diseases like diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. One speaker at the meeting predicted that when the first siRNA proved its efficacy in a Phase III clinical trial, this event would lead to an explosion of interest in siRNA by Big Pharma and the investment community. It seems inevitable that this will happen in the not too distant future.


About the Author
Dr. John Leavitt is an analyst for Tolland, Conn.-based Nerac Inc., a research and advisory firm for companies developing innovative products and technologies. He is an expert in the biotechnology fields of diagnosis and treatment of human diseases, genetics, and cell and molecular biology. For information, please visit www.nerac.com.

No popular authors found.
No popular articles found.